Thursday, August 19, 2010

Movie: "Under Suspicion" w G. Hackman&M.Freeman Anyone understand this movie? Can u explain it to this idiot?

We watched this move with intrigue and suspense! Good acting! What the heck was this movie all about? Who did what and why? Can't remember when I've felt so left in the dark, or is it that we just didn't get "some point"? We're lost!! Can anybody sort of explain this movie to us? How did the pictures get in the darkroom? Who put them there, and why? We're at a total loss about the whole movie really. Thanks.

Movie: "Under Suspicion" w G. Hackman%26amp;M.Freeman Anyone understand this movie? Can u explain it to this idiot?
he feels so full of guilt that he punishes himself by admitting to a crime he didnt commit
Reply:While San Juan celebrates San Sebastian's Feast, recently-divorced and world-weary police captain Victor Benezet calls in prominent attorney Henry Hearst to clarify his statement about discovering the body of a girl of about 12, the second such murder in two weeks. As Hearst answers unconvincingly, Benezet reveals circumstantial evidence: the lawyer is under suspicion. The interrogation strips away Hearst's dignity, public persona, and even his toupee, exposing a breech with his beautiful and much younger wife, questionable sexual predilections and a damning hobby. Then, Hearst's wife volunteers information that confirms police suspicions. The question should not be where the evidence comes form, my thought is the wife, but why would he confess if he didn't do it? My thought is he thinks she is the suspect for most of the show and then he realixes too late that they are after him and not her. That is when you learn that she probably set him up.


No comments:

Post a Comment